At my request, a number of police officers had run my photo through the Clearview app. While the company was dodging me, it was also monitoring me. “Imagine a rogue law enforcement officer who wants to stalk potential romantic partners, or a foreign government using this to dig up secrets about people to blackmail them or throw them in jail.” “The weaponization possibilities of this are endless,” said Eric Goldman, co-director of the High Tech Law Institute at Santa Clara University. The tool could identify activists at a protest or an attractive stranger on the subway, revealing not just their names but where they lived, what they did and whom they knew.Īnd it’s not just law enforcement: Clearview has also licensed the app to at least a handful of companies for security purposes. The computer code underlying its app, analyzed by The New York Times, includes programming language to pair it with augmented-reality glasses users would potentially be able to identify every person they saw. Tech companies capable of releasing such a tool have refrained from doing so in 2011, Google’s chairman at the time said it was the one technology the company had held back because it could be used “ in a very bad way.” Some large cities, including San Francisco, have barred police from using facial recognition technology.īut without public scrutiny, more than 600 law enforcement agencies have started using Clearview in the past year, according to the company, which declined to provide a list. Until now, technology that readily identifies everyone based on his or her face has been taboo because of its radical erosion of privacy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |